Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorT, Vasumathi
dc.contributor.authorC. P, Prasoon
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T04:58:39Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T04:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12818/1606
dc.description.abstractFormative assessment has been identified as one of the key components of an educational system which has an enabling orientation and an objective of competency building. The present research inquires whether the educational policies, curriculum and practices in Kerala envisage assessment that is formative in the context of increased rate of dropouts of culturally marginalised tribal students (CMTS) sampled from Wayanad district of the state. Specifically, the inclusive nature of formative assessment is examined. The question of dropout and marginalisation is addressed from the point of view of institutional responsibility of inclusiveness. The nature of the issue required a critical examination of theoretical works on institutionalisation of exclusion. In the course of the theoretical revisit, issues related to the nature of what is called reality and knowledge are unfolded. Examining theories on the role of language, ideology and discursive practices, the study comes to the position that structures of power and those of knowledge are linked with each other. However, this relationship is not taken as that of unidirectional determination. Oriented by this general theoretical perspective, the research probs into the issue of dropout and marginalisation of CMTS in the current educational system. The method and validation of data were carried out on the ground of theoretical standpoint. The theoretical framework of the research is formed after an examination of textual, historical and objectivist views. Avoiding bracketing approaches on the basis of binary oppositions, relevant correlating elements were intelligibly derived from these diverse and conflicting approaches with an eye on the purpose of the present research and ̳multi-sourced‘ theoretical approach has been developed and exercised in the research. The theoretical approach of the research is designated as textual-historical and objective. The study used the design of concurrent triangulation within the general framework of mixed methodology. The collected data were inductively analysed to derive observable themes which fall into defined categories and codes. The five major themes that surfacethemselves are: Dropout and marginalisation, Inclusive School, Differentiated Teaching, Organisation of Learning Session and Institutional Framework.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPrasoon C. Pen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsINTRODUCTION Need and Significance of the Study Title of the Study Operational Definitions Objectives of the Study Research Questions Methodology in Brief Scope and Delimitation of the Study Organisation of the Report 1-24 10 15 15 17 18 19 20 22 II THEORETICAL OVERVIEW Theoretical Underpinning 25-62 27 Marginalisation and self-representation- Grounding of Theories Statement of Researcher‘s position Inclusion and Inclusive Education III Formative Assessment REVIEW OF LITERATURE Studies Related to Dropout and marginalisation and Self-representation Studies Related to Inclusive Education Studies Related to Formative Assessment Research Gap IV METHODOLOGY Research Philosophy Post-positivist Paradigm 40 46 50 56 63-92 65 74 79 91 93-141 93 94V Ontological Assumptions Epistemological Assumptions 94 97 Methodological Assumptions Textual-Historical and Objective Methodology 100 105 Reality is Textual and Historical Textuality and Historicity in Data Validation Standpoint Theory: Theoretical Background of the Study Participants and Research Site Data Collection Procedure Rigor of Qualitative Data Data Analysis: Thematic Analysis Ethical Considerations ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION Theme I: Dropout and Marginalisation Theme II: Inclusive School 105 107 109 Theme III: Differentiated Teaching Theme IV: Organisation of Learning Session Theme V: Institutional Framework Conclusion VI VII 113 119 128 136 140 143-266 153 171 189 210 237 265 SUMMARY, FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS Summary of Findings Conclusion 267-279 Suggestions for Further Research RECOMMENDATIONS 278 281-284 REFERENCES APPENDICES 285-298en_US
dc.format.extent390p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Education, University of Calicuten_US
dc.subjectFormative Assessment, Marginalisation, Inclusive Education, Self-representation, Differentiated Teaching, Tribal Students, Concurrent Triangulation.en_US
dc.titleInclusive practices of formative assessment For self-representation of culturally Marginalised tribal students.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.Den_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record